Current:Home > NewsWhat to know about the Colorado Supreme Court's Trump ruling, and what happens next -TradeBridge
What to know about the Colorado Supreme Court's Trump ruling, and what happens next
View
Date:2025-04-17 04:57:06
Washington — An unprecedented ruling by the Colorado Supreme Court that bans former President Donald Trump from the state's 2024 ballot is unlikely to be the final word on the matter.
The court put its ruling on hold until Jan. 4, anticipating that Trump would appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, setting up a showdown to decide whether the Republican presidential front-runner can remain in the race just as primaries begin in early states.
What did the ruling say?
The Colorado Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that former President Trump is disqualified from holding the presidency under the Constitution's so-called insurrection clause. But the issue divided the seven justices — all of whom were appointed by Democratic governors.
"President Trump did not merely incite the insurrection," the court wrote in the 4-to-3 ruling. "Even when the siege on the Capitol was fully underway, he continued to support it by repeatedly demanding that Vice President [Mike] Pence refuse to perform his constitutional duty and by calling Senators to persuade them to stop the counting of electoral votes. These actions constituted overt, voluntary, and direct participation in the insurrection."
The court issued several findings in its decision, including:
- The Jan. 6, 2021, riot was an an insurrection
- Trump "engaged in" an insurrection
- Trump's speech "inciting the crowd" before the riot was "not protected by the First Amendment"
- Colorado law allows voters to challenge Trump's eligibility under the insurrectionist clause
- The clause can be enforced without action from Congress
- The clause applies to the presidency
Can Trump appeal?
The Trump campaign called the decision "completely flawed" and said it will "swiftly" appeal the ruling.
"We have full confidence that the U.S. Supreme Court will quickly rule in our favor," Trump campaign spokesman Steven Cheung said in a statement.
David Becker, CBS News election law contributor, said it's not mandatory that the Supreme Court take this case, but "it's almost a 100% likelihood that they will take on this case."
What is the insurrection clause?
The Constitution's insurrection clause — Section 3 of the 14th Amendment — has been used to challenge Trump's eligibility for the ballot in several states.
The provision seeks to prevent those who swore an oath to support the Constitution but "engaged in insurrection or rebellion" against the U.S. from holding state or federal office. It originally sought to keep former Confederate civil and military officeholders from serving in government and has rarely been used in modern times. The Colorado Supreme Court's decision is the first time it's been used to disqualify a presidential candidate.
Does it apply to other states?
Anti-Trump plaintiffs have brought the insurrectionist clause argument to keep Trump off the ballot to courts in several states.
The Colorado ruling does not apply to other states, though it could embolden others to take action. Colorado, which leans Democrat, is not a competitive state for Trump in the general election. However, if Trump were to be disqualified from the ballot in a swing state, it would put Republicans at a massive disadvantage.
The Colorado ruling stands in contrast with several recent legal decisions on the matter.
Last month, a Minnesota Supreme Court decision said the state party can put anyone on its primary ballot. But the court said petitioners could try again in the context of the general election.
In Michigan, the court of appeals decided just last week that it won't stop Trump from appearing on the state's 2024 Republican primary ballot. The court affirmed two lower court rulings, without determining whether the insurrection clause applied to Trump.
"Who to place on the primary ballot is determined by the political parties and the individual candidates," the appeals court said in a 3-0 opinion, citing Michigan law.
- In:
- Colorado
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Donald Trump
Caitlin Yilek is a politics reporter at cbsnews.com and is based in Washington, D.C. She previously worked for the Washington Examiner and The Hill, and was a member of the 2022 Paul Miller Washington Reporting Fellowship with the National Press Foundation.
TwitterveryGood! (48674)
Related
- Tom Holland's New Venture Revealed
- Evan Ross and Ashlee Simpson's Kids Are Ridiculously Talented, Just Ask Dad
- Big Oil’s Top Executives Strike a Common Theme in Testimony on Capitol Hill: It Never Happened
- Teen Mom's Tyler Baltierra Details Pure Organic Love He Felt During Reunion With Daughter Carly
- The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
- Chris Noth Slams Absolute Nonsense Report About Sex and the City Cast After Scandal
- Alabama executes convicted murderer James Barber in first lethal injection since review after IV problems
- 5 things we learned from the Senate hearing on the Silicon Valley Bank collapse
- Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
- 6 people hit by car in D.C. hospital parking garage
Ranking
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- The FDIC says First Citizens Bank will acquire Silicon Valley Bank
- Warming Trends: Banning a Racist Slur on Public Lands, and Calculating Climate’s Impact on Yellowstone, Birds and Banks
- Saudis, other oil giants announce surprise production cuts
- Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie return for an 'Encore,' reminisce about 'The Simple Life'
- Inside Clean Energy: Yes, We Can Electrify Almost Everything. Here’s What That Looks Like.
- Amazon is cutting another 9,000 jobs as tech industry keeps shrinking
- ‘A Trash Heap for Our Children’: How Norilsk, in the Russian Arctic, Became One of the Most Polluted Places on Earth
Recommendation
SFO's new sensory room helps neurodivergent travelers fight flying jitters
Armed with influencers and lobbyists, TikTok goes on the offense on Capitol Hill
Who are the Hunter Biden IRS whistleblowers? Joseph Ziegler, Gary Shapley testify at investigation hearings
All new cars in the EU will be zero-emission by 2035. Here's where the U.S. stands
'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
The fight over the debt ceiling could sink the economy. This is how we got here
A Just Transition? On Brooklyn’s Waterfront, Oil Companies and Community Activists Join Together to Create an Offshore Wind Project—and Jobs
Sophia Culpo Seemingly Shades Ex Braxton Berrios and His Rumored Girlfriend Alix Earle